FOCUSED SPRINT — ONE QUESTION, ONE WEEK, ONE ANSWER
One specific question. Five business days. A data-backed answer your team acts on — not another month of debating without evidence.
A clear answer with data behind it — or full refund · 5-day delivery
WHAT YOU HAVE AT THE END
Fixed price · One week delivery
In one week, we turn your data into a clear, visual answer. Your team gets a dashboard they can use to make the decision and move forward.
SALES DIRECTOR
"Which of our new features should we push to our sales team first?"
We connect to your usage data and show which features your best customers actually use. You get a ranked list with clear adoption numbers. This stops the internal debate and tells sales exactly what to lead with.
MARKETING MANAGER
"Is our new ad campaign actually working, or should we pull the budget?"
We build a dashboard that tracks sign-ups and costs from that specific campaign. You see daily if it's profitable or not. This gives you the evidence to confidently continue or stop spending.
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
"What's causing the sudden spike in support tickets this week?"
We link your support tickets to recent app updates or user actions. You get a chart showing the exact cause, like a confusing new button. This lets your product team fix the real problem, not guess.
WEEKLY REPORTING
The CEO asks for last week's key metric, and you spend hours building a slide.
We build a single dashboard that automatically updates with that key number every Monday. You just open it and have the answer. This saves you hours of manual work every week.
From kickoff to a written answer with data behind it. Read-only access — no engineering time required from your team.
A data-backed answer to your specific question — or full refund. No conditions.
One price. Everything included. Analysis, visualisations, recommendation, readout call, and next-question roadmap.
THE SAME QUESTION KEEPS COMING UP AND NOBODY HAS ANSWERED IT
Same debate, three consecutive sprint plannings
“We’ve had the same question in three consecutive sprint plannings. Everyone has an opinion. Nobody has pulled the data. We keep deciding to ‘look into it’ and then running out of time.”
VP Product — B2B SaaS, $8M ARR
Roadmap built on gut — next planning cycle in two weeks
“We built the entire roadmap on a gut assumption about which segment retains best. Now we have data but nobody’s structured it properly. I need to know if we were right before we go into the next planning cycle.”
Head of Product — Series B
Internal analyst overloaded — one question taking three weeks
“We hired a data analyst three months ago. She’s great. But answering one specific question takes her three weeks because she has ten other things going on. I just need this one thing answered fast.”
CEO — Seed stage
Board meeting in 10 days — no structured answer ready
“The board meeting is in 10 days. They’re going to ask about retention by cohort. I have the data somewhere but I don’t have a structured answer and I don’t have the bandwidth to build it this week.”
Head of Growth — Series A
WHAT THIS TYPICALLY REVEALS
The question your team is debating usually has a clear answer in the data.
Most teams argue because nobody has structured the analysis. Not because the data doesn’t exist — because pulling it and interpreting it properly keeps getting deprioritised.
The first answer often reframes the next question entirely.
Once one question is resolved with data, the follow-up question becomes more precise. You stop debating the wrong problem and start scoping the right one.
A specific question answered in one week unblocks weeks of stalled decisions.
The cost of leaving the question unanswered is rarely zero. Teams build features, adjust pricing, or allocate resources on assumptions that one analysis could confirm or correct.
Broad reports bury the answer. A focused sprint surfaces it.
When a consultant reviews your data for two weeks and hands over a 40-page report, you get a ranked list of everything that could be improved. You still have the same decision — what to do first. One question forces the answer to be useful.
WHY THIS IS DIFFERENT
The constraint is the point. One question forces the analysis to be useful rather than comprehensive.
Broad analytics engagements produce broad findings. When analysis tries to cover everything, you get a ranked list of possible improvements and the same decision you started with — what to do first.
The Focused Sprint works differently because the scope is fixed from the start. One question, agreed on the kickoff call. The analysis is pointed at that question and nothing else. The answer has to be specific because there’s only room for one. The recommendation has to be actionable because it’s the only output.
If the data genuinely doesn’t support a clear conclusion, that’s the answer — documented with what data would resolve it and what to do in the meantime. You don’t get a hedge. You get the most useful thing the data can tell you.
TIMELINE
A 30-minute kickoff call. We agree on the exact question, what data is available, and what a useful answer looks like. Read-only data access set up before the call ends.
The analysis runs against the agreed question and nothing else. Visualisations built as findings emerge. If the question needs reframing, that’s flagged before day 5.
45-minute readout with your team. The answer, the data behind it, the recommendation, and next questions. Everything handed over — nothing withheld.
Day 6: the debate is over. Your team acts on the answer.
WHAT YOU GET
Most analyses fail because they answer the wrong question. Before anything is pulled, the question is defined precisely — what data is needed to answer it, what "good enough confidence" looks like, and what decisions the answer will inform.
The relevant data is pulled and interpreted in context. The raw numbers mean nothing without the surrounding signal — every finding is explained in terms of what it actually means for the decision at hand.
You'll know how much to trust the answer. Every conclusion comes with an explicit confidence rating and the reasoning behind it — so you can decide how boldly to act rather than guessing at the reliability of the analysis.
The first explanation is often wrong. The leading interpretation is stress-tested against plausible alternatives so you're not building strategy on a fluke in the data or a spurious correlation.
A metric that looks alarming today might be seasonal. A trend that looks healthy might be masking decay. The historical baseline is layered in so you're reading the signal correctly — not reacting to noise.
An 8–12 page report built around your specific question — not a generic template. The structure follows the logic of the answer, written to be shared with your board, investors, or team leads.
Charts designed to communicate, not to impress. Each one is built to stand alone in a slide deck or email thread, with a clear title that tells the reader what to conclude.
A single, direct statement of what the data shows — written in plain English, with an explicit confidence rating. No hedging paragraphs. No buried conclusions. The answer is the first thing you read.
What to do next, and why. The recommendation is grounded in the analysis and ranked by expected impact — not a generic best-practice list that could apply to any company.
Every answer surfaces the next important question. The questions worth investigating next are mapped out so your team doesn't lose momentum after the sprint closes.
A live walkthrough of the findings so nothing gets misread, recorded for your team. For 15 days after delivery, email access and one follow-up call for implementation questions as they arise.
Everything above for $1,997. No hourly billing. No scope creep. Everything stays with your team.
FIT CHECK
The situation
Your team has a specific analytical question it’s been debating — about retention, churn, activation, pricing, feature adoption, or expansion. The question is specific enough to write in one sentence. You have event data in an analytics tool. The debate hasn’t been resolved because nobody has pulled the analysis and called it.
What you leave with
The decision that’s been stalled for weeks gets made this week.
When this sprint doesn’t apply
If answering the question requires data that doesn’t exist yet — surveys to run, events to instrument, experiments to conduct — the sprint can’t produce an answer in 5 days. Similarly, if the “question” is really 3 or 4 questions bundled together, the sprint isn’t the right format. The kickoff call surfaces this before any money changes hands.
Better starting points
The Focused Sprint answers one question and recommends one action. Your team does the building. If you need the full picture — including implementation — that’s a different engagement.
Jake McMahon — ProductQuant
I run this sprint myself. It’s the lowest-friction way to work together — one question, one week, one answer. Not a discovery process that takes 3 weeks to scope. Not a broad audit that produces 20 recommendations of varying priority. The constraint is deliberate.
One question forces the analysis to be useful rather than comprehensive. The recommendation has to be specific because there’s only one. If the answer is “the data doesn’t support a clear conclusion,” that’s the answer — documented with what data would resolve it and what to do next. You don’t get a hedge. You get the most useful thing the data can tell you right now.
Teams Jake has worked with




PRICING
A clear answer with data behind it — or full refund. No conditions.
Book a 30-minute call →A clear answer backed by your data — or full refund. If the data can’t support a clear conclusion, we identify that in the kickoff call and scope what’s possible before any money changes hands. The deliverable either contains a data-backed answer or it doesn’t.
5 business days from now you have one clear answer, one prioritised recommendation, and no ambiguity about what to do first. The debate is over.